ReSolution Wrap-Up – the latest in Asia-Pacific regional agreements

RCEP is growing and more countries are signing up to the Singapore Convention - Alex and Alice track some recent changes to international agreements concerning the Asia-Pacific region.
Author(s): Alexander Lyall and Alice Elcoat
A Chinese airplane can be seen arriving from New Zealand.

New Zealand and China announce paths to strengthen trade links

In June, high-ranking New Zealand and Chinese politicians utilised recent exchanges to commit to the strengthening of trade between New Zealand and China.

The visit of Chinese Premier Li Qiang to New Zealand marked a considerable step in the relations between China and New Zealand. Notably, during his visit, it was announced that China would be removing the need for New Zealanders to obtain a visa for travel lasting under 15 days.

While this was occurring, New Zealand trade minister Todd McClay visited the Chinese minister of commerce, Wang Wentao, in Beijing. The two used the occasion to launch negotiations on service trade. The negotiations will tie into the 2022 New Zealand-China Free Trade Agreement Upgrade Protocol, an upgrade to the original 2008 New Zealand-China Free Trade Agreement.

The 2022 Upgrade sought to create pathways to strengthen cooperation on competition policy, e-commerce, government procurement and the impact of trade on the environment. The negotiations launched by the ministers will work towards updating the rules for trade in services.

Minister McClay also commented on China’s recent applications to join CPTPP and the Digital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA). The minister reaffirmed that China’s acceptance into the blocs would rest on the collective decisions of the current member States. DEPA was signed in 2020 between New Zealand, Singapore and Chile with the intention of creating a framework for trade rules in the digital economy.

RCEP Update: Chile, Hong Kong and Sri Lanka look to join world’s largest economic bloc

When the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was formed in 2020, it immediately became the largest free trade agreement by population. By 2025, that might expand further with the potential entry of the bloc by Chile, Hong Kong and Sri Lanka.

  • Chile – In mid-June, Chile’s undersecretary for international economic relations, Claudia Sanhueza Riveros, submitted the formal letter of application. If successful, Chile would be the first member State from Latin America and the first from outside the Asia-Pacific region.
  • Hong Kong – Hong Kong submitted a formal request to join RCEP immediately after it came into force in early 2022. The secretary for commerce and economic development, Algernon Yau, outlined a portion of Hong Kong’s strategy for acceptance, including engaging in meetings with the member States as well as business stakeholders.
  • Sri Lanka – The Sri Lankan president, Ranil Wickremesinghe, revealed in 2023 that Sri Lanka’s application earlier that year had been made to strengthen economic links with China, Japan and South Korea. The move forms part of Sri Lanka’s overall pivot to increase trade with East Asia. Sri Lanka has identified the region as having advanced rapidly.

RCEP currently includes New Zealand, Australia, ASEAN, Japan, South Korea and China. New Zealand ratified RCEP in November 2021.

Equatorial Guinea joins ICSID, Honduras takes a step back

The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) has just welcomed Equatorial Guinea as its 166th member. In June, Equatorial Guinea’s ambassador to the United States signed the ICSID Convention with the intention of ensuring strong legal guarantees to foreign investors.

Once Equatorial Guinea ratifies the ICSID Convention, it will be represented in the Administrative Council. This means that Equatorial Guinea will be able to participate in ICSID’s governance, including the approval of rules of procedure for ICSID cases.

In other ICSID news, Honduras has formally announced its decision to leave. In February, Honduras sent the World Bank written notice under Article 71 of the ICSID Convention of its denunciation of the ICSID Convention.

The written notice means that in six months denunciation will occur, releasing Honduras from its obligations to subject itself to ICSID’s dispute resolution mechanics. The World Bank has since upheld its duty under Article 75 to notify all ICSID signatory states, including New Zealand.

Sri Lanka ratifies, and Iraq signs, the Singapore Convention

What is the Singapore Convention?

The United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (the Singapore Convention) entered into force on 12 September 2020. This landmark instrument lays the foundation for effective international trade and commerce across borders, offering a framework for parties to a commercial dispute to enforce and invoke international written settlement agreements resulting from mediation (Article 1). This amicable approach to resolving disputes is consistent with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 16 of promoting peaceful and inclusive societies and justice for all.

Since its enactment, the Singapore Convention has received overwhelming global support. As of 3 July 2024, it has 57 signatories and 14 parties, including some of the world’s largest economies, such as the United States of America, China, India and the United Kingdom.

Sri Lanka

On 24 February 2024, Sri Lanka ratified the Singapore Convention after the Sri Lankan Parliament enacted the Recognition and Enforcement of International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (Act No. 5 of 2024) in January 2024. The Act reflects the general principles of the Singapore Convention and adopts a wide interpretation of commercial consistent with the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration.

Iraq

More recently, Iraq signed the Singapore Convention in April 2024. One of Iraq’s main justifications for joining is to maintain trade relations and create a more effective business environment.

New Zealand’s position

Despite being a mediation-friendly jurisdiction, New Zealand has not signed the Singapore Convention. Given its global popularity and the increasing emphasis on using mediation to settle disputes, time will tell whether New Zealand will follow suit.

Other resources you might like

If you found this article helpful and are interested in learning more, there is a wealth of other resources available on our website. We have a wide array of articles and guides on a variety of topics, each designed to provide you with a deeper understanding of the subject matter. We encourage you to explore these resources and deepen your knowledge.

A person wearing blue jeans and a white shirt holds several coins in their right hand, with their left pocket turned inside out, against a plain background.

Where do directors’ duties lie once insolvency looms?

Hong Kong Court refuses to set aside arbitral award over claim lawyer couldn’t read witness’ body language in virtual hearing.

In BTI 2014 LLC v. Sequana S.A. [2022] UKSC 25, the UK Supreme Court handed down its judgment which examined the role of directors when a company becomes, or is likely to become, insolvent. The decision looked at when directors were to consider the overriding interests of the company’s creditors when dealing with insolvency.

Australian Hague Rules: party to shipping dispute rails against arbitration clause

In Carmichael Rail Network Pty Ltd v BBC Chartering Carriers GmbH & Co KG, [1] the High Court of Australia assessed whether engagement in arbitration in a foreign jurisdiction could contravene law designed to protect cargo owners. The decision is an illustration of the stability of arbitration as a method of dispute resolution.
Aerial view of a cargo ship docked at a port. The ship is loaded with multicolored shipping containers. Three large green cranes are positioned alongside the ship, with their shadows cast on the deck and water. The port area has rows of containers.

Supreme Court of New South Wales finds force majeure clause offered no protection for loss and damage to goods in transit

In Woolworths Group Ltd v Twentieth Super Pace Nominees Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 344, the Supreme Court of New South Wales applied a narrow interpretation to the meaning and effect of a force majeure clause, finding that it did not override other clauses in the contract, or alter the overall allocation of risk intended by the parties.

Get in touch

Contact our team today to see how we can help

Contact us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.