Financial Services Disputes

Arbitration and mediation are increasingly being adopted as preferred processes for the resolution of disputes arising within the financial services sector
Contact Us

The ability to have a dispute arbitrated or mediated by a third party who has specialist knowledge and experience within the financial services sector is increasingly being viewed as essential to ensuring a credible dispute resolution process.

NZDRC is also often called on to administer expert determinations for finance and tax disputes. In 2019, the Chartered Accountants Australian and New Zealand (CAANZ) announced that it would not provide a service nominating independent experts and selected NZDRC as an alternative provider for contractual dispute resolution, recognising NZDRC’s experience in this area.

NZDRC has arbitrators, mediators and experts working with us who have a significant level of experience in dealing with a wide range of issues which commonly present in financial services disputes. This means NZDRC is well placed to ensure the most robust, professional and sector specific service is available for parties operating within this sector.

Additionally, NZDRC’s processes are specifically designed to ensure the most proportionate level of response is adopted providing parties with a fair, prompt and cost effective means of resolving their dispute. Both processes also allow commercial parties to resolve their disputes in a private forum maintaining confidentiality.


NZDRC provides both ad hoc arbitration services as well as institutional arbitration under its Arbitration Rules. Both options provide parties with access to arbitration on either a fixed or capped fee basis, providing parties with much needed certainty in terms of cost.

The NZDRC Arbitration Rules are intended to give parties the widest choice and capacity to adopt fully administered procedures that are fair, prompt and cost effective, and which provide a proportionate response to the amounts in dispute and the complexity of the issues involved. A summary procedure (early dismissal of claims and defences) is also available under the NZDRC Rules providing parties to financial disputes with access to an early resolution in appropriate cases.

NZDRC’s ad hoc arbitration service provides parties with flexibility to craft their own process while still giving them access to NZDRC’s institutional oversight, assistance, and support. Importantly, the service also provides certainty in terms of a capped arbitration fee.

When entering into a contract, we recommend that parties adopt one of our model clauses to ensure they can access these services should a dispute arise at a later date. Model clauses for both NZDRC ad hoc arbitration and NZDRC institutional arbitration may be found here.


NZDRC’s commercial mediation offering provides commercial parties with a professional, fully administered, and credible mediation process. For commercial parties who are looking to craft a more flexible solution to their dispute, this option empowers parties to develop and explore mutually benefical settlement options with the assistance of an independent third party mediator who brings with them significant industry specific experience.

A model clause for mediation may be found here.

Expert Determination

Expert determination has become a popular method of resolving disputes in a number of industries involving qualitative or quantitative issues, or issues that are of a specific technical nature or specialised kind, because it is generally quick, inexpensive, informal and confidential.

The principle attraction of expert determination is that it can provide a binding (or non-binding) determination without involving many of the formalities that can beset arbitration and litigation. It also has the advantage of assisting in preserving business relationships where strictly adversarial proceedings may not.

A model clause for expert determination may be found here.


Find out more

NZDRC has significant knowledge and experience, which has been built up over the course of more than 30 years during which we have delivered consistent, professional and credible private dispute resolution services. Contact us today to find out more about how we can help you or your clients.

Harman obligation released for documents from mining arbitration

By Richard Pidgeon The implied undertaking of confidentiality in Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 not to use documents discovered in a proceeding for collateral purposes was released in Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd v Hancock...

Serious irregularity standard in arbitration

By Richard Pidgeon In Cipla Limited v Salix Pharmaceuticals Inc [2023] EWHC 910, the English High Court has confirmed a high threshold exists for successful challenges to awards on the basis that the arbitral tribunal committed serious irregularity because it failed...

Leave for second appeal declined in lease dispute arbitration

By Richard Pidgeon In The Gama Foundation v Fletcher Steel Limited [2023] NZCA 243, the Court of Appeal reiterated the strict New Zealand tests set out in Gold and Resource Developments (NZ) Ltd v Doug Hood Ltd [2000] 3 NZLR 318 (CA) and Downer Construction (New...

LinkedIn Lips Sink Ships: Singapore Court of Appeal finds India had already posted into the public domain

Written by Alexander Lyall In a recent decision, The Republic of India v Deutsche Telkom AG [2023] SGCA(I) 4, the Singapore Court of Appeal helps clarify the circumstances where the amended privacy provisions of Singapore’s International Arbitration Act may not apply....

Southern Summary Judgment Stoush

By Richard Pidgeon In the Invercargill High Court, in Northlake Investments Limited v Civil Construction Limited [2023] NZHC 2715, a developer and contractor battled in substantive proceedings following an adjudication under the Construction Contracts Act 2002 (the...


Written by Kate Holland In Sky Power Construction Engineering Limited v Iraero Airlines JSC [2023] HKCFI 1558, the losing party in an arbitration unsuccessfully applied to set aside the award on the basis that the virtual hearing had prevented it from adequately...

Court orders parties back to arbitration

By Sam Dorne The recent case of Sesderma, S.L. v Seeky International Limited and Golong Co. Ltd [2023] HKCFI 1619, heard in the Hong Kong Court of First Instance, examined the law of issue estoppel and the governing law of arbitration agreements. An issue estoppel...

Enforcement and recognition of foreign awards made in international arbitrations: as easy as one, two, three…

By Maria Cole A Court’s hands can be tied if a party does not ask for its assistance. In this case, the losing parties in an international arbitration had a foreign award enforced against them because they failed to ask the local Court to consider the law on when...

Singapore High Court compels party to arbitration to engage in mediation

By Kate Holland Caption: In the first case of its kind in Singapore, the High Court highlighted the trend towards the promotion of amicable dispute resolution as one of the reasons for compelling the parties to attend mediation. In the first case of its kind in...

Federal Court of Australia Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award of $40 Million

By Sam Dorne In Guoao Holding Group Co Ltd v Xue (No 2) [2022] FCA 1584, the Federal Court of Australia granted enforcement in Australia of a foreign arbitral award issued in China, and dismissed objections that enforcement would be contrary to Australian public...
Skip to content