GROCERY INDUSTRY DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCHEME DELIVERED BY THE NEW ZEALAND DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTRE GOES LIVE 

Minister Andrew Bayly, the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, announced yesterday that he has approved the rules of the Grocery Industry Dispute Resolution Scheme. The scheme is now in force. The New Zealand Dispute Resolution Centre (NZDRC) is proud to have been selected to provide this scheme for the grocery industry, and to now have it available for use.

About the Scheme

The scheme enables quick, cost-effective resolution of disputes worth up to $5 million between suppliers to and wholesale customers of the regulated grocery retailers. This covers: the designated regulated grocery retailers (Foodstuffs North Island Limited, Foodstuffs South Island Limited and Woolworths New Zealand Limited) and their related parties (including franchisees); and suppliers of groceries under the grocery supply code or wholesale customers for groceries under the wholesale access regime in the Act. All regulated grocery retailers must comply with the rules of the scheme.

The grocery industry dispute resolution scheme takes effect under the Grocery Industry Competition Act 2023 (the Act) and the Grocery Supply Code 2023, and the rules of the scheme. Details regarding the scheme can be found on the NZDRC website via: www.grocerydispute.co.nz

The scheme is funded by the designated regulated grocery retailers and is accessible by their suppliers and wholesale customers under the rules of the scheme.

NZDRC undertook an extensive consultation on the proposed rules of the scheme with relevant industry and regulatory stakeholders. The rules were then approved by Minister Andrew Bayly.

NZDRC is grateful for the Minister’s support and input, and that of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, the Grocery Commissioner and the Commerce Commission.

Michael Jamieson, Manager – Commercial Contracts of the New Zealand Dispute Resolution Centre commented,

“We are delighted to be working with the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs and the inaugural Grocery Commissioner, Pierre van Heerden, to assist the industry participants to resolve their disputes efficiently.

The extensive consultation period, during which key stakeholders had full opportunity to review the Scheme’s proposed rules, was an extremely positive experience. We received thoughtful and positive feedback that suggests everyone is aware of the Scheme’s importance and is committed to making it work.

We are pleased to have the grocery industry dispute resolution scheme up and running. We look forward to working with grocery suppliers, wholesale customers, the regulated grocery retailers and other stakeholders to make the scheme successful.”

“The New Zealand Dispute Resolution Centre is the leading provider of commercial dispute resolution services in Aotearoa New Zealand. We have over 30 years’ experience designing and delivering dispute resolution processes and services as an alternative to court proceedings.”

Other resources you might like

If you found this article helpful and are interested in learning more, there is a wealth of other resources available on our website. We have a wide array of articles and guides on a variety of topics, each designed to provide you with a deeper understanding of the subject matter. We encourage you to explore these resources and deepen your knowledge.

A red cable car is pictured traveling uphill in an urban area with a lush green field, city buildings, and mountains in the background. The scene is bright and clear under a blue sky, resembling the clarity often sought in discussions about reduction of damages for contributory negligence.
General

Leaky Home Case: Failure to obtain a building report results in reduction of damages for contributory negligence

Apportionment for contributory negligence allows a court to share the responsibility between parties in circumstances where the test for causation and remoteness of damage justifies it. It doesn’t mean a respondent will not be held liable for negligence, but it can affect the amount of damages awarded to a claimant, as Roberts v Jules Consultancy Limited (in liq) [2021] NZCA 303 has shown.
Learn more
A close-up of a person's hand resting on a desk, with a set of golden scales in the foreground. They are in front of a window. There are stacks of books and a spiral notebook on the desk. The scales symbolize balance and justice.
General

It’s up to the parties to frame the claim: court of appeal overturns decision where judge became “third man” to the proceedings

The Court of Appeal of England and Wales overturned a High Court decision where the Judge held a warranty had been breached on a basis which differed substantially from how the claim had been notified, pleaded and argued.
Learn more
Aerial view of a suburban neighborhood featuring houses with yards, driveways, and cars parked on paved driveways. The street is lined with tall trees casting long shadows, and the homes have varied roof colors and styles, with greenery surrounding them.
General

Expert “evidence” needs to be more than just bald assertions to win the day

Leakage issues in a building can be a real dampener. A recent decision of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal) which considered conflicting expert evidence on water ingress issues in a newly built property highlighted the importance of having sufficient and specific expert evidence to support the denial of a claim. It also emphasised the essential role this plays in the outcome of a matter.
Learn more

Get in touch

Contact our team today to see how we can help

Contact us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.