ReSolution Issue 48 & 49

October 2026

Content

From the Editor  
Feature article 

ADR for Misaligned Software Projects, by Gerard Doolin 

ReSolution in Brief  
  • Falling outside the scope: New Zealand High Court determines arbitrator lacked jurisdiction.  
  • New Zealand Court of Appeal rejects one-stop shop argument in Ministry of Primary Industries biosecurity dispute.  
  • Water, water everywhere, but no mistakes: English High Court finds no serious irregularity in arbitral award.  
  • Hong Kong Court of First Instance finds tribunal did not allow prejudice to impact party in share purchase agreement dispute.  
Case in Brief  
  • United Kingdom Supreme Court rejects state immunity defence, denying Spain and Zimbabwe’s application to set aside arbitral awards.  
Other articles:  
  • Leadership and Dispute Resolution: Silence is not alignment 
  • Court presumes parties intended their disputes to be resolved in one-stop adjudication 
  • Redefining “reasonableness” in cross-lease alterations: Liow v Martelli [2026] NZCA 101 
  • A clause that works only on paper: Designing cross-border dispute pathways that SMEs can actually use 
  • Security that sticks: Singapore’s Pro-Arbitration Approach to Enforcing an Award Against an Arrested Ship 
  • They have a hopeless case, so why won’t they settle? 
  • The Finality of a Rabbinical Arbitral Award 
  • Cross-Border Enforcement: High Court Reaffirms Finality of Mainland Judgments Notwithstanding “Trial Supervision” System 
  • The long arm of the (English) law 

Related issues