The Trusts Act 2019: What you need to know

Although exact numbers are unknown, it is estimated there are hundreds of thousands of trusts in New Zealand. The new Trusts Act 2019 came into force on 30 January 2021. It brings a number of significant changes to trust law and is the first major reform in 70 years. The new Act applies to existing and future family trusts, trading trusts and trusts created under wills.
Author(s): Melissa Perkin and Melt Strydom
A man in a suit sits at a desk with various documents, a laptop, and a small bronze statue of Lady Justice prominently placed in the foreground. The focus is on the statue, with the man and background slightly blurred.

Introduction

Some key changes in the new Act involve the settlor’s role. In addition, there is the inclusion of new mandatory duties for trustees, which reiterate their obligations to act in good faith and to ensure they perform their duties for a proper purpose and for the benefit of the beneficiaries. The ability of beneficiaries to hold trustees to account is strengthened, and the Act makes changes affecting how trusts operate including, for example, more flexible trustee powers to manage and invest trust property. 

The new Act also provides mechanisms to resolve trust related disputes by making alternative dispute resolution (ADR), such as mediation or arbitration, more accessible to resolve both internal (between trustees and/or beneficiaries) and external trust disputes involving third parties. Prior to this Act, it was considered that disputes relating to trusts were not capable of resolution through mediation or arbitration because many beneficiaries of trusts were discretionary and therefore their interests could not be safeguarded or considered. 

In future articles, we will examine these changes in detail, but we have summarised some key aspects below. 

A woman in a white blouse and black blazer holds a bronze statue of Lady Justice, who is depicted wearing a blindfold and holding a balance scale and a sword. The woman's nails are painted silver, and she wears a silver ring.
A woman sitting at a desk looks at a piece of paper while a man stands beside her, also looking at the paper. A laptop is open on the desk, and papers are scattered around. The setting appears to be an office with white brick walls and potted plants.

Settlor’s role

Settlors should remind themselves of their roles in the trust and consider whether any steps should be taken by them in exercising these roles. By way of example: 

  • do they hold the power to appoint and remove trustees? 
  • do they have the power of adding and removing beneficiaries? 
  • can they have input into variations of the trust deed? 

Trustee’s duties have expanded

There are greater compliance requirements for the trust. All trustees have record keeping obligations and will be required to contact beneficiaries and supply them with basic trust information if they have not already done so. 

There is a limit on trustee exemption and indemnity clauses. Under the new Act, the terms of a trust deed must not limit or exclude a trustee’s liability for any breach of trust arising from the trustee’s dishonesty, wilful misconduct, or gross negligence. 

There are also now mandatory and default duties that are imposed on trustees. 

Mandatory duties 

Mandatory duties must be performed by the trustee and any attempt to exclude a mandatory duty will have no effect. Such mandatory duties include that a trustee: 

  • must know and act within the terms of the trust; 
  • acts honestly and in good faith; 
  • must deal with trust property for the benefit of the beneficiaries; 
  • is to further the purpose of the trust; and 
  • exercises their powers for proper purpose. 
A man in a blue suit and glasses is sitting at a desk, gesturing with his hand, and talking to a woman with long dark hair in a tan blazer. They are in a white room with a white desk that has a small statue, a newspaper, and a pair of glasses on it.

Default duties 

Default duties that must be performed by trustees unless modified or excluded in the trust deed include: 

  • to take care in administration of the trust that is reasonable in the circumstances; 
  • to invest prudently; 
  • not to exercise powers for the trustee’s own benefit; 
  • to actively and regularly consider the exercise of the trustee’s powers; 
  • not to bind or commit trustees to a future exercise or non-exercise of discretion; 
  • to avoid conflict of interest between the trustee and the beneficiaries; 
  • impartiality to beneficiaries (however it should be noted that impartiality does not necessarily mean equality as between beneficiaries); 
  • not to profit; 
  • to act for no personal reward; and 
  • to act unanimously if there is more than one trustee. 

Alternative dispute resolution

One of the most significant developments in the new Act is the inclusion of ADR for both internal and external trust disputes, rather than taking a dispute to court.  The Act offers a pragmatic alternative for the resolution of trust disputes, even where a trust deed is silent as to the possibility of ADR. The Act also explains the difference between external and internal matters with the key distinction being that an external matter involves a third party outside the trust circle. 

A trustee will be able to refer a matter to ADR with the agreement of each party. ADR cannot however be used to resolve a legal proceeding or dispute about the validity of all or part of the trust. 

For an internal matter between trustees and/or beneficiaries that has been referred for ADR, where the matter does not involve third parties, and beneficiaries are unascertained (for example if they are not yet born or lack capacity), a Court must appoint representatives for those beneficiaries, and those representatives may agree to an ADR settlement, or agree to be bound by an arbitration agreement and any arbitral award under that agreement. Any such ADR settlement (but not arbitral award) must be approved by the Court. This protects the interests of the beneficiaries and includes those who are discretionary beneficiaries. 

A man in a black suit sits at a wooden desk with papers, a book, and a cup, talking to a couple seated across from him on a brown leather couch in an office with wooden shelves and certificates on the wall.

ADR is possible without the agreement of all parties, if the trust includes a provision that requires a dispute to be subject to an ADR process, or if the trust contains no contrary intention and the court considers ADR would be appropriate (at the request of a trustee or a beneficiary or on the Court’s own motion). This power however only applies to internal matters between trustees and/or beneficiaries (not a matter involving third parties). This means that external matters are only able to be resolved by ADR if there is a provision in the trust deed that requires or empowers a trustee to refer an external matter to an ADR process, or if all parties (including the third parties) consent to the ADR process. 

Why opt for the Trust Act’s ADR process when parties can just go to court? 

  • confidentiality; 
  • cost-effectiveness; 
  • faster resolution than litigation through the courts, and the parties can control the time element through agreement; and 
  • the parties can agree on the person tasked to intervene. 

For more information on ADR options, click here. 

Other resources you might like

If you found this article helpful and are interested in learning more, there is a wealth of other resources available on our website. We have a wide array of articles and guides on a variety of topics, each designed to provide you with a deeper understanding of the subject matter. We encourage you to explore these resources and deepen your knowledge.

A dispute resolution professional holds a briefcase.

CEO secrets: English High Court grants stay for arbitration in £45 million conflict of interest proceedings

In NTT Limited & Others v Goodall1 the High Court granted a case management stay of proceedings in favour of arbitration, even though the arbitration involved only some of the parties. The Court provided practical guidance on the correct test to be applied in refusing or granting a stay, particularly in multi-party proceedings.
Night view of Brooklyn Bridge with illuminated skyscrapers of Manhattan in the background reflecting in the East River, New York City. The scene features a mix of modern and historic architecture under a clear night sky.

What are the implications of becoming a contracting state to the New York convention?

Two people shaking hands across a desk, one wearing a dark suit and the other without a visible outfit. A document and a pen are on the desk, with a laptop partially visible beside them, suggesting a business or professional agreement.

It’s Time: How New Zealand can bring together Latin America and Asia

Is it time for work to begin again on the Southern Link project? Here, we identify the opportunities which have arisen since the easing of COVID-19 restrictions, and how New Zealand can take advantage of these.

Get in touch

Contact our team today to see how we can help

Contact us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.