Fair Trading Amendment Bill receives Royal Assent

A wooden gavel rests on a sounding block in the foreground. In the background, two individuals are shaking hands across a table. Legal documents and a pen are also visible on the table.

As we noted in our 12 August 2021 alert on amendments to the Fair Trading Act introduced by the Fair Trading Amendment Bill, significant changes are made on the application of the unfair contract terms regime to business to business or small trade contracts. The Bill received Royal Assent on 16 August 2021 and is now the Fair Trading Amendment Act 2021 (Amendment Act).

Some of the changes made by the Amendment Act are now in force. Of particular note are:

  • Extended warranties: Businesses that make extended warranty agreements with customers over the telephone must provide a copy of the agreement to the customer within five working days of the date it is agreed. Customers can cancel an extended warranty agreement within five working days of receiving the agreement.
  • Management banning orders: The Amendment Act extends the set of circumstances where directors or managers may be subject to a management banning order.

The extension under the Amendment Act of the unfair contract terms regime to include small trade contracts and prohibitions on unconscionable conduct to include parties engaged in trade, as well as changes to uninvited direct sales, comes into force on 16 August 2022.

What is a “small trade contract”?

Under the Amendment Act, a small trade contract is a standard form contract where the parties are engaged in trade; is not a consumer contract; and does not comprise or form part of a trading relationship that exceeds an annual $250,000 value threshold when the relationship first arises.

How is an unfair contract term determined?

A term will be considered “unfair” where the term (cumulatively):

  • would cause a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations arising under the contract;
  • would cause detriment(whether financial or otherwise) to a party if it were applied, enforced, or relied on – current case law is that this is a low threshold; and
  • is not reasonably necessary in order to protect the legitimate interest of the party who would be advantaged by the term.

Businesses should use this time to understand their new obligations and align their current practices if they are not already doing so.

Other resources you might like

If you found this article helpful and are interested in learning more, there is a wealth of other resources available on our website. We have a wide array of articles and guides on a variety of topics, each designed to provide you with a deeper understanding of the subject matter. We encourage you to explore these resources and deepen your knowledge.

An eagle soars above a tranquil New Zealand lake reflecting rugged, green-carpeted mountains under a dramatic sky at sunset. The scene captures the serene and majestic essence of nature, with a stunning transparency as the eagle's reflection mirrors in the calm water below.

New Zealand still rated as global leader for public sector transparency, honesty and integrity

Transparency International has just released the 2021 Corruption Perception Index (CPI). New Zealand has retained its joint number one ranking along with Denmark, as having one of the least corrupt public sectors in the world. This year Finland joins the top-slot as third equal.

New Zealand’s score remains a “clean” 88/100, which is great news. However, the global average of 43/100 has also not moved. It has now been stagnant for ten years in a row. Two-thirds of the countries have scored below 50, indicting serious corruption problems. Of them, 27 have obtained their lowest scores ever. The figures reveal a worrying standstill in all regions of the world in the fight against public sector corruption. A summary of some of the issues raised in the CPI is below. The full report and supporting data can be found here.

AI Transforming Legal Practice: Highlights from GAITC 2025 Law & AI Forum 

The Law & AI Forum, held in Hangzhou, China, was a key feature of the Global Artificial Intelligence Technology Conference (GAITC). Centred on the theme “Digitalisation of the Rule of Law and Legalisation of the Digital World,” the forum brought together more than 260 legal professionals, scholars, and technologists for in-depth discussions on the evolving relationship between artificial intelligence and the legal domain. An additional 6,000 participants joined the event online.

The forum was hosted by the Chinese Association for Artificial Intelligence (CAAI), and co-organised by the Digital Laboratory of Rule of Law at Zhejiang University, the CAAI Artificial Intelligence Logic Committee, PKULAW,[1] and Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press.
A woman with curly hair and glasses, dressed in a turquoise top, holds folders against her chest with one hand while resting her other arm on her forehead. She stands in front of a plain off-white wall, appearing tired or stressed.

Unfair terms in consumer contracts – important changes to the Fair Trading Act 1986

A 2018 Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) survey of small businesses found that 45 per cent of participants considered that they had been offered unfair contract terms in the last year, and 47 per cent considered that they had otherwise been treated unfairly.[1]

Get in touch

Contact our team today to see how we can help

Contact us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.