Fair Trading Amendment Bill receives Royal Assent

A wooden gavel rests on a sounding block in the foreground. In the background, two individuals are shaking hands across a table. Legal documents and a pen are also visible on the table.

As we noted in our 12 August 2021 alert on amendments to the Fair Trading Act introduced by the Fair Trading Amendment Bill, significant changes are made on the application of the unfair contract terms regime to business to business or small trade contracts. The Bill received Royal Assent on 16 August 2021 and is now the Fair Trading Amendment Act 2021 (Amendment Act).

Some of the changes made by the Amendment Act are now in force. Of particular note are:

  • Extended warranties: Businesses that make extended warranty agreements with customers over the telephone must provide a copy of the agreement to the customer within five working days of the date it is agreed. Customers can cancel an extended warranty agreement within five working days of receiving the agreement.
  • Management banning orders: The Amendment Act extends the set of circumstances where directors or managers may be subject to a management banning order.

The extension under the Amendment Act of the unfair contract terms regime to include small trade contracts and prohibitions on unconscionable conduct to include parties engaged in trade, as well as changes to uninvited direct sales, comes into force on 16 August 2022.

What is a “small trade contract”?

Under the Amendment Act, a small trade contract is a standard form contract where the parties are engaged in trade; is not a consumer contract; and does not comprise or form part of a trading relationship that exceeds an annual $250,000 value threshold when the relationship first arises.

How is an unfair contract term determined?

A term will be considered “unfair” where the term (cumulatively):

  • would cause a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations arising under the contract;
  • would cause detriment(whether financial or otherwise) to a party if it were applied, enforced, or relied on – current case law is that this is a low threshold; and
  • is not reasonably necessary in order to protect the legitimate interest of the party who would be advantaged by the term.

Businesses should use this time to understand their new obligations and align their current practices if they are not already doing so.

Other resources you might like

If you found this article helpful and are interested in learning more, there is a wealth of other resources available on our website. We have a wide array of articles and guides on a variety of topics, each designed to provide you with a deeper understanding of the subject matter. We encourage you to explore these resources and deepen your knowledge.

General

AI Transforming Legal Practice: Highlights from GAITC 2025 Law & AI Forum 

The Law & AI Forum, held in Hangzhou, China, was a key feature of the Global Artificial Intelligence Technology Conference (GAITC). Centred on the theme “Digitalisation of the Rule of Law and Legalisation of the Digital World,” the forum brought together more than 260 legal professionals, scholars, and technologists for in-depth discussions on the evolving relationship between artificial intelligence and the legal domain. An additional 6,000 participants joined the event online.

The forum was hosted by the Chinese Association for Artificial Intelligence (CAAI), and co-organised by the Digital Laboratory of Rule of Law at Zhejiang University, the CAAI Artificial Intelligence Logic Committee, PKULAW,[1] and Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press.
Learn more
A small wooden boat named "Lady Irene" rests on a pebble beach with the sea and a partly cloudy sky in the background. The boat is slightly elevated on wooden supports, and its rich, polished wood contrasts with the light-colored pebbles.
General

Ten years in a leaky boat: Lucky just to keep afloat

In 1982 Split Enz released its now famous single Six Months in a Leaky Boat being a reference to the time it took pioneers to sail to New Zealand (it had nothing at all to do with being an attack on Britain’s invasion of the Falkland Islands which caused the BBC to discourage airplay of the song in Britain during the Falklands War – it was recorded in January 1982, months before the Falklands invasion). It has also been suggested that the lyrics are a metaphor for a relationship that could not be, the need to put our differences behind us and that there is a world to explore after ’the ship-wreck’, and to keep on trying where there’s wind in our sails. Neil Finn’s lyrics and the sentiment embodied in the song provide a strikingly apposite segue into the relationship property story that follows.
Learn more
Aerial view of a cargo ship docked at a port. The ship is loaded with multicolored shipping containers. Three large green cranes are positioned alongside the ship, with their shadows cast on the deck and water. The port area has rows of containers.
General

Supreme Court of New South Wales finds force majeure clause offered no protection for loss and damage to goods in transit

In Woolworths Group Ltd v Twentieth Super Pace Nominees Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 344, the Supreme Court of New South Wales applied a narrow interpretation to the meaning and effect of a force majeure clause, finding that it did not override other clauses in the contract, or alter the overall allocation of risk intended by the parties.
Learn more

Get in touch

Contact our team today to see how we can help

Contact us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.