Rent relief in the COVID-19 lockdown

For those who have commercial leases, there are questions around whether there is a right for tenants to ask for rent relief and if so, what that relief should look like.

A commonly used form of commercial lease is the Auckland District Law Society lease, which has been in use since 2010. That lease (in clause 27.5) makes provision for rent reduction, where the tenant is unable to gain access to the leased premises because of an emergency situation, such as the COVID-19 lockdown. In such cases, a fair proportion of the rent and outgoings cease to be payable.
Author(s): Catherine Green
A large conference room with a long table surrounded by tan swivel chairs. The room, often used for commercial rent lease dispute mediations, has a high ceiling with recessed lighting and a projector. Floor-to-ceiling windows provide a view of an outdoor landscape. Laptops and office supplies are on the table.

There has been much publicity since the start of the lockdown on what is a fair proportion of the rent and outgoings that should cease to be payable. It is not uncommon, depending if you are a landlord or a tenant, that what is fair looks very different. While many commercial parties have been able to resolve this with negotiation, there are a large number who have not been able to do so and who require assistance. 

NZDRC has launched a reduced cost and fixed fee arbitration and mediation service specifically to help parties to such leases, so they can access a fast and cost-effective means of resolving their rent dispute, providing them with commercial certainty in uncertain times. 

How can arbitration help?

The objective of arbitration is to provide a flexible and efficient means of resolving disputes quickly, cost effectively, privately and confidentially without necessarily adhering to the formalised, technical procedures of litigation. 

Whilst arbitration is closely related to litigation, there are several key differences which make it an important and attractive alternative to state litigation. In particular, arbitration gives the parties the power to choose their own decision maker, place and time of a hearing, and as far as they can agree, to control the arbitration procedures which may be varied to suit the nature and complexity of the dispute. 

Parties who wish to avail themselves of this special fixed fee service, will need to agree to proceed under the NZDRC ECA45 Arbitration Rules. 

Those Rules are specifically designed to allow the quickest and most cost effective resolution of commercial disputes, providing for a documents only arbitration procedure which is designed to result in an Award being made which finally determines all substantive issues in dispute within 45 working days. 

This provides parties with a definitive answer within the shortest possible time and at the lowest possible price.

A woman with long dark hair is standing in a modern office, wearing a navy blue blazer and black skirt. She is smiling and has her arms crossed. Behind her are shelves with books related to low-cost fixed fee arbitration services and commercial rent lease disputes during the COVID-19 lockdown. The office has a sleek and tidy design.

How can mediation help?

Mediation is a consensual, confidential and relatively informal negotiation process in which parties to a dispute use the services of a skilled and independent mediator to assist them to define the issues in dispute, to develop and explore settlement options, to assess the implications of settlement options and to negotiate a mutually acceptable settlement of that dispute which meets their interests and needs. 

The objective of mediation is to enable and empower the parties to negotiate and resolve the dispute promptly, cost effectively and confidentially rather than to have a decision imposed upon them by a judge, arbitrator or adjudicator. The process enables the parties to negotiate flexible and creative solutions which need not conform to strict legal rights or general community standards. 

In this way, where parties are willing and able to work toward a settlement of the dispute, mediation can help them find a solution that may better meet more of their respective needs and requirements than what might otherwise be the outcome where a decision is made based on their strict legal rights and obligations. 

The special mediation service launched will provide the parties with a half day mediation. This will take place by videoconference and can be set up and completed within short order (for urgent matters within 24 hours). 

Four people are standing and smiling in an office setting. Two of them are shaking hands, indicating a friendly or professional interaction, possibly discussing low cost fixed fee arbitration for commercial rent lease disputes. There is a plant on a shelf in the background, adding a touch of greenery to the otherwise minimalistic room.

How to access the NZDRC services

Whether parties choose to arbitrate or mediate, they will need to agree to engage in that process. This can be done by completing the special form agreement to arbitrate or special form agreement to mediate, copies of which may be downloaded directly from the NZDRC website. 

Once the agreement has been signed, the parties simply need to contact the NZDRC Registry staff who will guide them and their advisers through the process. 

Other resources you might like

If you found this article helpful and are interested in learning more, there is a wealth of other resources available on our website. We have a wide array of articles and guides on a variety of topics, each designed to provide you with a deeper understanding of the subject matter. We encourage you to explore these resources and deepen your knowledge.

A large yellow and white front loader with a raised scoop is parked in a sand quarry. Behind the loader are various layers of sand and soil in different shades, and in the distance, there are green trees atop the sandy hills.
Arbitration

Harman obligation released for documents from mining arbitration

The implied undertaking of confidentiality in Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 not to use documents discovered in a proceeding for collateral purposes was released in Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd [No 21] [2023] WASC 169, with some conditions.
Learn more
Close-up of three pieces of Whittaker & Sons dark chocolate with a textured surface, partially stacked on each other. The image highlights the rich, dark brown color and rough edges of the chocolate pieces against a blurred brown background.
Arbitration

Husky Food Importers & Distributors Ltd v JH Whittaker & Sons Ltd [2022] ONSC 1679

New Zealand confectionary and chocolate manufacturer, JH Whittaker & Sons Ltd (Whittaker’s), has brought a successful motion to stay litigation commenced against it by Husky Food Importers & Distributors Ltd (Husky) in the Ontario courts in Canada. The Ontario Superior Court of Justice found it was arguable that a valid arbitration agreement existed and that the dispute was covered by the arbitration agreement, and referred the parties to arbitration administered by the New Zealand International Arbitration Centre (NZIAC).

Not only is the decision to be applauded given its adherence to orthodoxy regarding the ‘competence-competence’ principle and its pro-arbitration stance, it provides valuable lessons for drafting – particularly with respect to the incorporation of standard terms of trade.
Learn more
A person in a suit sits at a desk, writing with a pen on a piece of paper. The image focuses on their hands and the pen, with their face and upper body blurred in the background. The setting appears to be a professional or formal environment.
Arbitration

Marco Polo’s arbitration odyssey: When can the courts play the guessing game?

Two similar cases. Two different jurisdictions. Two different outcomes. How did two courts in Hong Kong and Singapore reach such opposing conclusions on whether a mystery Chinese arbitration centre can be read into an agreement? The cases, while held in different common-law jurisdictions, saw arbitration clauses put under the microscope due to errors at the drafting stage. In both, the parties had attempted, and failed, to name an arbitration centre in China. Despite the commonalities, the courts treated the mistake in different ways. The clear unpredictability of these decisions shows why care and precision are needed when drafting arbitration agreements, and why periodically reviewing your nominated centre(s) might not be such a bad idea.
Learn more

Get in touch

Contact our team today to see how we can help

Contact us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.