Resolve your commercial lease rent review dispute quickly and cost-effectively 

Unfortunately, rent review disputes are common, especially in the current economic climate. They are often stressful, time-consuming and expensive and may damage the ongoing relationship between the landlord and the tenant.  

What are your options if you are involved in a rent review dispute? 
Author(s): Favour Lawry

We now offer fixed-fee rent review arbitration to help you resolve your dispute quickly and cost-effectively, with no cost surprises. There is no hearing: the decision is made “on the documents”, and an award is made within 25 to 35 working days after the claim is filed.  

This means that the landlord and tenant receive an answer much faster than in a court setting or a typical arbitration with a hearing. They deal swiftly with the dispute and move on.  

This service costs $5,000 plus GST, payable in advance. The landlord and tenant pay this in equal shares unless they agree otherwise. There is no cost award: costs lie where they fall, giving cost certainty. 

Other key features of our fixed-fee rent review arbitration are: 

  • It can be used for market reviews, PPI reviews, or fixed percentage or fixed dollar reviews. It can also address disputes over “caps” and “collars” and how they apply. 
  • Permitted documents for filing: 
    • The deed of lease or agreement to lease; 
    • Any relevant variations; 
    • Any documents recording any relevant prior rent reviews; and  
    • Valuation reports and any other relevant expert reports or evidence.
  • The parties get a full opportunity to submit their case and to see and comment on each other’s case. However, to save costs and have an efficient process, there are limits on the submissions:  
    • Claim and response submissions up to 10 pages each; and  
    • Reply and rejoinder submissions up to five pages each.  
  • The service is private and confidential, unlike court proceedings.  

Another option is mediation. Mediation allows the landlord and tenant to agree on a mutually beneficial outcome. This process is private and confidential. It can save dispute costs and help preserve the ongoing landlord and tenant relationship. For these reasons, it is a good alternative option to consider. 

We also offer expert determination. This is especially useful for market reviews where the landlord and tenant have registered valuers’ reports, and a significant gap exists between them. We can appoint an independent expert to determine the outcome in a private and confidential process. Again, this is a quick, cost-effective way to resolve the commercial rent review dispute, compared to court or an arbitration with a hearing. 

If you wish to discuss these options further or have any questions, please contact us at registrar@nzdrc.co.nz  or freephone at +64 9 486 7153. We are happy to help.  

Other resources you might like

If you found this article helpful and are interested in learning more, there is a wealth of other resources available on our website. We have a wide array of articles and guides on a variety of topics, each designed to provide you with a deeper understanding of the subject matter. We encourage you to explore these resources and deepen your knowledge.

A woman wearing a mask is sitting at a desk, participating in a video call on her laptop during one of many pandemics lockdowns. The person on the screen is also masked. The desk features potted plants, a notebook, and small decor items, all set in a brightly lit room.

Changes on the way for commercial lease Covid-19 rent disputes

When the math matters: NZDRC arbitrator gets rent review right

Rent review disputes might not make headlines, but when they end up in arbitration — and then in the High Court — the details matter. A recent case involving a decision of one of NZDRC’s arbitrators, Catherine Green, is a good reminder of why getting the numbers right is so important.
A close-up view of a laptop displaying stock market charts and data. Hands are visible typing on the keyboard. In the background, people in business attire appear to be engaged in a discussion, one holding documents while another operates a tablet.

Arbitrator’s exercise of phantom jurisdiction

In CMB v Fund, Cattle and Management [2023] HKCFI 760, the Hong Kong Court of First Instance ruled that a pre-emptive arbitration should be set aside as there was no dispute between the immediate parties to the arbitration and the award was beyond the arbitrator’s jurisdiction.

Get in touch

Contact our team today to see how we can help

Contact us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.