Eternity Sky Investments v Zhang: would-be consumer’s appeal on public policy matter backfires

Author(s): Alexander Lyall

In a previous article, we covered Eternity Sky Investments Ltd v Zhang [2023] EWHC 1964 (Comm) Ms Zhang applied to the English High Court to set aside a Hong Kong arbitral award on the basis that she was protected by the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (the Act).

Central to Ms Zhang’s argument was that the relevant contract was signed by her as a consumer and that it had a close connection to the United Kingdom. This being the case, the rights accrued under the Act meant that enforcing the award would run against public policy by way of section 103(3) of the Arbitration Act 1996.

The High Court agreed that Ms Zhang was a consumer but held that the contract did not have a close connection to the United Kingdom, despite Ms Zhang’s citizenship. Ms Zhang appealed the judgment.

In Eternity Sky Investments Ltd v Zhang [2024] EWCA Civ 630, Ms Zhang argued again that as a citizen and resident of the United Kingdom, the contract in which she had given a personal guarantee for the bond of her deceased husband’s business had a close connection to the United Kingdom.

The Court of Appeal (the Court) agreed with the High Court. Each aspect of the contract concerned a matter closely related to Hong Kong. Two factors also stuck out for the Court:

  1. It was Ms Zhang herself who commenced arbitration in Hong Kong.
  2. The contract had not even been signed in the United Kingdom.

These two points further underscored that Ms Zhang’s association with the United Kingdom was limited.

Ms Zhang loses consumer status

Unfortunately for Ms Zhang, in addition to losing the appeal the Court also disagreed with the High Court that she was a consumer.

Ms Zhang had entered into a commercial transaction and had done so to support the business. While Ms Zhang’s personal motivation may have stemmed from the marriage, this was not the function of the transaction.

The Court reiterated at [74] that motivation is to be determined objectively by the sphere of activity of the transaction. Whether Ms Zhang was a consumer should have been determined in relation to the particular transaction, and not other aspects of her personal life.

Otherwise, a clearly unworkable situation would arise. Separate duties attach to contracts when one party is a consumer. The adoption of Ms Zhang’s argument would see parties needing to constantly second-guess the motivation of their counterparties to avoid falling afoul of protections afforded to consumers.

Other resources you might like

If you found this article helpful and are interested in learning more, there is a wealth of other resources available on our website. We have a wide array of articles and guides on a variety of topics, each designed to provide you with a deeper understanding of the subject matter. We encourage you to explore these resources and deepen your knowledge.

Hong Kong Court of First Instance weighs up status of interim injunction. Was it an award?

Four people in business attire are gathered around a table in a bright office. Two individuals are seated, reviewing documents with model clauses, while the other two stand, observing and discussing. A small plant and glass bottle are on the table under a skylight.

Clause and effect: the importance of well-drafted model clauses

Contracts, like disputes, come in all shapes and sizes. Most parties to a contract are keen to get the deal finalised and signed on the dotted line as quickly as possible. There isn’t always an appetite to pore over model clauses in a contract, with the parties generally agreeing that as long as there is some form of dispute resolution clause in place, all will be well. Unfortunately, if your dispute resolution model clauses are not well-drafted, this approach may come back to bite. This article will explore what a model clause is, how it operates and why it is vital to parties not only in times of strife but also in ensuring that commercial relationships can be maintained during less tumultuous times.
Open office with wooden desks, computer monitors, and various office supplies. A person works at a desk in the background. The space is decorated with plants and has large windows allowing natural light to fill the room.

When can an arbitrator voluntarily resign and what are the implications for the arbitration?

Circumstances can arise when an arbitrator in a domestic arbitration needs to voluntarily resign their appointment. But what is the status of the arbitration if this occurs? Does the court have jurisdiction to step in? This article looks at a recent Canadian decision which addresses these questions and provides guidance on the factors an arbitrator should consider before voluntarily resigning.

Get in touch

Contact our team today to see how we can help

Contact us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.