Arbitration FAQ

You will find answers to many frequently asked questions below. If you do not find the answer to your question, please contact us and we would be happy to assist.

Apply Now
A woman sitting at a table shakes hands with a person across from her. Another person holding a tablet is also present. The room has glass walls and modern decor. The woman wears glasses and a brown blazer. A smartphone is on the table.

Arbitration FAQ

What is arbitration?

Arbitration is a method of resolving disputes outside of court. In this process, the parties involved in a dispute agree to bring their issues to a neutral third party, known as an arbitrator. The arbitrator then reviews the case, considers the arguments of both sides and makes a final and binding decision (called an award).

Arbitration and mediation are both forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), but they differ in several key aspects.

Mediation is generally less formal and structured than arbitration. The process is flexible and can be tailored to the needs of the parties. It often involves informal discussions and may take place in a more relaxed setting. In mediation, a mediator facilitates communication and negotiation between the parties but does not make a decision or impose a resolution. The mediator helps the parties to define the issues in dispute, explore settlement options, and reach a voluntary and mutually acceptable resolution that meets their needs and interests. However, a mediator does not have the authority to make any decisions for the parties.

Arbitration proceedings are more formal and structured, resembling a trial. A neutral third party (the arbitrator) acts as a decision maker and makes a final and binding decision similar to a court judgment (called an award) after hearing and considering the arguments and evidence of the parties and applying the relevant law.

Overall, while both arbitration and mediation offer alternatives to traditional litigation, their differences lie primarily in the role of the neutral third party, decision-making authority, formality of the process, and finality of the outcome.

Arbitration offers several advantages over traditional litigation and other forms of dispute resolution, which contribute to its popularity in commercial and civil matters. Some of the key advantages of arbitration include:

Flexibility: Arbitration offers greater flexibility in terms of scheduling hearings, choosing arbitrators, and determining procedural rules. Parties have more control over the process, allowing them to tailor it to their specific needs and preferences.

Speed: Arbitration proceedings are often faster than litigation in court. The arbitration process typically involves fewer formalities and procedural delays, resulting in quicker resolution of disputes.

Confidentiality: Arbitration proceedings are generally private and confidential. Unlike court proceedings, which are typically a matter of public record, arbitration allows parties to keep their dispute and its resolution out of the public eye.

Expertise of decision-makers: Parties have the opportunity to select arbitrators with expertise in the subject matter of the dispute. This ensures that decisions are made by individuals who understand the technical, industry-specific, or legal aspects of the issues involved.

Cost-effectiveness: While arbitration may involve upfront costs, such as arbitrator fees and administrative expenses, it can be more cost-effective in the long run compared to litigation. Arbitration proceedings are generally less complex and time-consuming, leading to lower legal fees and expenses.

Finality and enforceability: Arbitration awards are usually final and binding on the parties, with limited grounds for appeal. This provides certainty and closure to the dispute, as parties can move forward knowing that the decision is legally enforceable.

Overall, the advantages of arbitration make it an attractive option for parties seeking a faster, more flexible, and cost-effective alternative to traditional litigation for resolving disputes.

In general, the ability to appeal an arbitration decision (called an award) is very limited compared to the appeals process in traditional litigation. This is because one of the key advantages of arbitration is finality—the idea that arbitration awards provide a final and binding resolution to disputes.

Parties may agree to limit or waive their rights to appeal as part of the arbitration agreement or under any institutional arbitration rules that govern the process.

However, there are limited circumstances under which an arbitrator’s award can be appealed including procedural irregularity, exceeding authority, fraud, corruption or bias, violation of public policy, and (narrow) questions of law. It’s important to note that the threshold for overturning an arbitral award is high, and such appeals are not often successful.

The arbitrator plays a central role in the arbitration process, acting as a neutral third party responsible for resolving the dispute between the parties. The primary responsibility of the arbitrator is to render a final and binding decision on the dispute (called an award) based on the evidence, arguments, and applicable law presented by the parties during the arbitration hearing.

Overall, the arbitrator plays a critical role in ensuring that the arbitration process is fair, impartial, and conducted in accordance with the agreed-upon rules and procedures.

Arbitration can be used for a wide range of disputes, including commercial, consumer, employment, construction, intellectual property, IT, ESG, trusts, wills and estates, and relationship property disputes (subject to some specific requirements). While arbitration can be a flexible and effective means of resolving disputes, there are certain types of disputes for which arbitration is not suitable or may not be legally permissible. For instance, certain matters of public law, such as criminal cases, must be resolved through the court system.

Yes, arbitration proceedings are typically private and confidential.

Unlike court proceedings, which are matters of public record, arbitration proceedings are private. There are no public records of arbitration hearings or awards, and the details of the dispute are not made available to the public.

Confidentiality is one of the key characteristics that differentiate arbitration from traditional litigation in court. Confidentiality in arbitration protects commercially sensitive business information, trade secrets, and other proprietary information that may be disclosed during the arbitration process. This allows parties to freely present their case without fear of sensitive information becoming public knowledge.

Overall, the private and confidential nature of arbitration proceedings is one of the reasons why parties choose arbitration as a method of dispute resolution. It provides a more discreet and less adversarial environment for resolving conflicts compared to litigation in court.