NZDRC to administer the .nz Dispute Resolution Scheme on behalf of the Domain Name Commission.

The New Zealand Dispute Resolution Centre (NZDRC) is proud to announce that it has been selected by the Domain Name Commission to administer the .nz  Dispute Resolution Scheme on its behalf. This change is effective today, 1 October 2024. This new role underscores the NZDRC’s commitment to providing reliable and effective dispute resolution services.
“We are honoured to take on this responsibility from the Domain Name Commission and are dedicated to providing an enhanced scheme to the Domain Name Commission for the benefit of all stakeholders,” said Michael Jamieson, Manager – Commercial of NZDRC.
He continued,
“As New Zealand’s digital landscape evolves, the work of the Domain Name Commission is essential to ensuring a level playing field and keeping the .nz space fair for everyone. The transition has involved a refresh of the scheme’s rules including a tikanga-based option and accessibility options. Stakeholders have been consulted and encouraged to participate in this process to ensure the scheme meets their needs.”
Domain Name Commissioner Barbara Pearse said,
“We are thrilled that the NZDRC will administer the .nz Dispute Resolution Scheme. We want to ensure .nz is world-class, and we have chosen the NZDRC based on their extensive experience and established presence in the market. Their proven track record in implementing a tikanga-based approach within other administered schemes is of particular significance to us as a regulatory body in Aotearoa. We look forward to working with them to serve the needs of our evolving market.”
  For more information, please visit our website at www.domainnamedispute.nz  or http://www.nzdrc.co.nz/dnc-dispute-resolution-scheme/

Other resources you might like

If you found this article helpful and are interested in learning more, there is a wealth of other resources available on our website. We have a wide array of articles and guides on a variety of topics, each designed to provide you with a deeper understanding of the subject matter. We encourage you to explore these resources and deepen your knowledge.

Aerial view of a cargo ship docked at a port. The ship is loaded with multicolored shipping containers. Three large green cranes are positioned alongside the ship, with their shadows cast on the deck and water. The port area has rows of containers.

Supreme Court of New South Wales finds force majeure clause offered no protection for loss and damage to goods in transit

In Woolworths Group Ltd v Twentieth Super Pace Nominees Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 344, the Supreme Court of New South Wales applied a narrow interpretation to the meaning and effect of a force majeure clause, finding that it did not override other clauses in the contract, or alter the overall allocation of risk intended by the parties.

Australian Hague Rules: party to shipping dispute rails against arbitration clause

In Carmichael Rail Network Pty Ltd v BBC Chartering Carriers GmbH & Co KG, [1] the High Court of Australia assessed whether engagement in arbitration in a foreign jurisdiction could contravene law designed to protect cargo owners. The decision is an illustration of the stability of arbitration as a method of dispute resolution.
A person is highlighting text on a printed contract document with a yellow marker. The document, which discusses the UK Supreme Court's return to an orthodox liquidated damages approach, is placed on a wooden desk next to a keyboard and mouse. Various sections and terms have some text already highlighted.

UK Supreme Court returns to orthodox liquidated damages approach

The UK Supreme Court in its recent judgment in Triple Point Technology v PTT Public Company[1] has brought welcome clarity in relation to the drafting and interpretation of liquidated damages clauses[2] in construction, commercial and technology contracts. The judgment also deals with the relationship between liquidated damages clauses and caps on liability. We summarise the judgment and provide some key points for drafting liquidated damages clauses and related caps on liability.

Get in touch

Contact our team today to see how we can help

Contact us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.