COVID-19 Commercial Lease Disputes: Free Arbitration and Mediation available now

A modern conference room with a long rectangular table surrounded by swivel chairs, a large screen mounted on one wall, floor-to-ceiling windows providing natural light and views of the outdoors, and a strip of dark seating along the windows.

Update 1 July 2021: Please note that the Government funded scheme has now come to an end but you can still access NZDRC’s low cost fixed fee scheme

Many commercial tenants found their leases were inadequate to deal with the consequences of the COVID-19 restrictions.  In a welcome step, the Government has established a scheme allowing parties with a qualifying dispute to access fully subsidised arbitration or mediation services (the Scheme).

Commercial leases without solutions

For those who have commercial leases, there were questions around whether there is a right for tenants to obtain rent relief as a result of the COVID-19 lockdown restrictions and, if so, what that relief should look like. Some leases contained a clause allowing a fair proportion of rent to be suspended during an emergency situation, but it was not clear what a fair proportion might mean.  Other leases did not expressly provide for any reduction of rent in such circumstances.

When we wrote about this previously, we explained how arbitration or mediation could help parties reach a resolution.  The usefulness of alternative dispute resolution has clearly been recognised by the Government.

Qualifying disputes and eligibility criteria

The Government’s initial proposal announced in June to amend the Property Law Act 2007 to allow for COVID-19 rental disputes to be referred for arbitration or mediation has had an overhaul. The Government has now put in place a fully funded dispute resolution scheme for qualifying disputes where landlords and tenants meet the eligibility criteria.

Qualifying dispute

A dispute will qualify if:

  • the dispute it is about the payment of rent and outgoings, where the tenant has experienced a material loss of revenue during a lockdown period because of Government lockdown restrictions put in place to combat COVID-19; and
  • the payment of rent and outgoings during the relevant lockdown period has not already been the subject of an agreement or arbitral award between the parties to the dispute.

Eligibility criteria

The eligibility criteria are clearly aimed at supporting smaller, New Zealand businesses.  As a result, there are two eligibility criteria that must be met before parties can access the subsidised Scheme:

  • the landlord and tenant must have a New Zealand based business; and
  • the business must have 20 or fewer full-time equivalent staff:
    • in the case of the tenant, per lease site;
    • in the case of the landlord, in total.

Mediation and arbitration by NZDRC

NZDRC is providing fully subsidised arbitration and mediation services as part of the Scheme.  As a result, no fee will be payable by the landlord or tenant.  Those who wish to take advantage of the fully subsidised Scheme will need to apply no later than 31 March 2021.

For lease parties who do not meet the eligibility criteria, NZDRC can still offer you low cost and fixes fee arbitration or mediation services.

To learn more about your options, and the difference between mediation and arbitration download our Introductory Guide.

A judge's gavel rests on a wooden desk in the foreground, symbolizing justice. In the background, slightly out of focus, a person in a judicial robe writes on a piece of paper, possibly signing legal documents or taking notes.

How to access the NZDRC services

Whether parties choose to arbitrate or mediate, they will need to agree to engage in that process. This can be done by completing the special form agreement to arbitrate or special form agreement to mediate, copies of which may be downloaded below:

Download a template Agreement to Mediate

Download a template Agreement to Arbitrate

Once the agreement has been signed, you can apply online or, if you have anyquestions, contact the Registry team who will guide you and your advisers through the process.

Other resources you might like

If you found this article helpful and are interested in learning more, there is a wealth of other resources available on our website. We have a wide array of articles and guides on a variety of topics, each designed to provide you with a deeper understanding of the subject matter. We encourage you to explore these resources and deepen your knowledge.

Two people sit at a conference table in front of a laptop during a video conference call. One person is holding a document, and the other is taking notes. A person on the screen is speaking and gesturing. There are glasses of water on the table.

Let me hear your body talk: Hong Kong Court refuses to set aside arbitral award over claim lawyer couldn’t read witness’ body language in virtual hearing 

In Sky Power Construction Engineering Limited v Iraero Airlines JSC [2023] HKCFI 1558, the losing party in an arbitration unsuccessfully applied to set aside the award on the basis that the virtual hearing had prevented it from adequately examining witnesses and presenting its case. The Hong Kong Court of First Instance found ‘no merit’ to this, and held that an in-person hearing would not have resulted in a different outcome. The decision highlights the Hong Kong courts’ acceptance of virtual proceedings as the new normal in a post-pandemic world.

“Careful and reasonable”: New Zealand Dispute Resolution Centre welcomes High Court finding on rent-review arbitral award  

The High Court (the Court) has declined an application to set aside an arbitral award administered by the New Zealand Dispute Resolution Centre ( NZDRC) and decided by one of its arbitrators, Catherine Green. The decision, A & H (Kumeu) Ltd v Kumeu Playschool Ltd, is noteworthy. [1] The Court did not just uphold the award because setting it aside is difficult. Rather, the Court commended the award for its numerical literacy, making note of the arbitrator’s understanding of the mathematical basis of the dispute. The Court also emphatically agreed with the arbitrator’s interpretation of a key clause in the parties’ lease agreement.
A brass scale of justice sits prominently on a glass desk, symbolizing law and fairness. In the background, a person in a suit, partially out of focus, examines documents, indicating that even in this seemingly straightforward setting, the court sees through layers of lipstick and linguistic camouflage.

The importance of certainty in international arbitration agreements

The UK Supreme Court has once again looked at how to determine the law that applies to an international arbitration agreement in the case of Kabab-Ji SAL v Kout Food Group [2021] UKSC 48. An interesting set of facts led the Court to look at an arbitration agreement arising out of arbitral proceedings in Paris that resulted in separate appeals both in England and France over the same set of facts, and how both Courts came to different conclusions, which in the end highlighted the absolute need for certainty when drafting international agreements.

Get in touch

Contact our team today to see how we can help

Contact us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.