No access clause implied in commercial leases

On 28 October 2021, the Government amended the Property Law Act to imply a ‘no access in an emergency clause’ into commercial leases which do not already provide for adjusted rent payment terms during an epidemic emergency. The implied clause applies from 18 August 2021, which was the start of the most recent rise in Alert Levels, but will not affect agreements between landlords and tenants to adjust rent obligations made prior to that date.
Author(s): Virginia Bonanni
A close-up of a silver house key inserted into a round, silver door lock, symbolizing the absence of an "access clause" often implied in commercial leases. The key has a key ring attached, holding several smaller metal rings that reflect light against a plain, dark background.

Businesses without ‘no access’ clauses have been liable to pay full rent throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, although many landlords and tenants have negotiated rent reductions even without a ‘no access’ clause. 

The no access clause allows the lease parties to agree on a ‘fair proportion’ of rent and outgoings that should be reduced during an emergency if the tenant cannot access the property to conduct their business fully. 

The assessment of what is a fair proportion of rent is subject to agreement between the landlord and tenant. They are to consider any loss of income experienced by the tenant during the period they are unable to access the premises due to lockdowns or because of reasons of health or safety related to the epidemic. 

The changes also require the parties to take all reasonable steps to respond to a communication from the other party about the operation of the no access clause, with any disputes being referred to arbitration under the Arbitration Act. Non-binding mediation and other dispute resolution alternatives such as expert determination may also be used to resolve the dispute. 

The New Zealand Dispute Resolution Centre is offering a speedy low-cost fixed fee arbitration and mediation service for parties in such disputes where they have been unable to agree an appropriate level of rent reduction. More information on these and our other dispute resolution services are available here. 

Other resources you might like

If you found this article helpful and are interested in learning more, there is a wealth of other resources available on our website. We have a wide array of articles and guides on a variety of topics, each designed to provide you with a deeper understanding of the subject matter. We encourage you to explore these resources and deepen your knowledge.

A modern hallway with a wall displaying signs for various legal and dispute resolution centers, including the New Zealand Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution. The area has large windows, plants, and a railing on the left side, allowing natural light to enter.

NZDRC Commercial Lease Scheme on the News

A wide-angle view of a soccer match in a large stadium packed with spectators. The scoreboard shows a 0-0 scoreline. Players are actively engaged on the field, with one team in red and white and the other in black and white. Bright stadium lights illuminate the scene.

Arbitrator Breached Duty to Act Fairly by Seeking an Opinion From a Third Party and Conducting his Own Research

The Commercial Court has remitted an award to the arbitrator for reconsideration on the basis of serious irregularity after the arbitrator sought the opinion of a third party and conducted his own research without notifying the parties.
A person in a suit is sitting at a table with a gavel in the foreground and a book in their left hand. The focus is on the gavel, suggesting a legal or judicial setting. The background is blurred, emphasizing the foreground objects.

What are the cost implications of challenging an arbitral award through the courts?

A recent decision of the Singapore High Court shone a spotlight on indemnity costs and when they will, and won’t, be granted following the unsuccessful challenge of an arbitral award. The decision highlighted the opposite principles in place between Singapore and Hong Kong when a losing party challenges the arbitrator’s award through the court system and fails. What are the underlying motivators for these differences, and how do they reflect the situation in New Zealand?

Get in touch

Contact our team today to see how we can help

Contact us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.