Resolving cross lease disputes

Going through another COVID-19 lockdown can be challenging, and disputes with neighbours may crystallise with people spending more time at home. Cross leases have been used for many years for shared land ownership, giving rights and imposing obligations on cross lease owners but problems can arise where cross lease neighbours don’t agree.
Author(s): Natalia Vila
A modern two-story house with a combination of blue and white siding, featuring a dark gray roof. The house has a three-car garage with multiple windows, a well-lit interior visible through the windows, and a small front yard with a young tree. The sky is at sunset.

What is a cross lease?

Cross lease titles have been used for many years as a simple way to subdivide land. Under this title, multiple homeowners jointly own the land, and have the right to use and occupy their own home together with any other area intended for exclusive use. 

A cross lease title includes an agreement between the homeowners setting out the terms and conditions of the lease. Typically, the lease requires the homeowners to seek consent from the other lease holders to make any major building or renovation work. The terms of the lease may also provide for the use and maintenance of the common areas, quiet enjoyment, or whether pets can be kept at the properties, amongst other matters. 

Needless to say, homeowners may find themselves not agreeing with their cross lease neighbour.  Depending on the terms of your cross lease, your neighbour might indeed be able to have a say in what you can or cannot do in your own home.

A quaint, white, two-story house with a pointed roof stands alone in a vast, golden wheat field under a clear blue sky with fluffy clouds. A flock of birds flies in the sky, enhancing the serene, rural atmosphere.

What does a typical cross lease dispute look like?

We answer many enquiries related to disputes between cross lease neighbours such as: 

  • My neighbour keeps blocking the driveway; 
  • The neighbour’s tree is blocking access to my parking spot and they refuse to cut it; 
  • I want to make renovations but my neighbour is not giving me consent; 
  • The neighbour’s dog is barking all day long; 
  • They are having loud parties all the time; 
  • They have built a swimming pool without telling me; 
  • The neighbour’s fence is now within the boundary of my backyard. 
A person tends to a vibrant garden in front of a one-story brick house. The garden is filled with colorful flowers and neatly trimmed bushes. The sky is clear with a few clouds, and the street in front of the house is quiet and empty.

There are ways in which we can help with these disputes.  Mediation and arbitration are the two most popular dispute resolution processes for these disputes. 

Mediation

Mediation is particularly effective when the parties would like to repair the relationship with their neighbours. This process encourages the parties to work together to come up with a solution that is mutually acceptable. One of the benefits of mediation is that parties can engage in creative solutions instead of focusing strictly on the terms of the cross lease.  Our mediators have high success rates in helping parties reach an agreement and are available to conduct mediation during COVID-19 lockdowns as well. 

Two individuals are shaking hands over a desk. The desk has a laptop, a cup of coffee, a pen, a pair of glasses, and documents. One person is wearing a white shirt, and the other is in a black sleeve, possibly indicating a formal agreement or business deal.

Arbitration

Many cross lease disputes are resolved by arbitration. The majority of the cross lease agreements contain an arbitration clause, which means that the homeowners have already agreed to refer disputes to private arbitration instead of going to court. Arbitration clauses are often included in cross lease agreements to enable parties to get their disputes dealt with quickly, cost effectively and privately. 

One of the main differences between arbitration and court litigation is that in arbitration the homeowners have to choose the decision-maker, but getting agreement from parties already in dispute means this can be challenging. The parties can instead agree on who should appoint an arbitrator on their behalf. All the parties need to do is enter an agreement for NZDRC to appoint an arbitrator. 

The homeowners in dispute will also need to decide on the procedural rules that will govern the way the arbitration is conducted. NZDRC’s ECA45 Arbitration Rules are a popular choice for these types of disputes, and they offer the parties a fast and cost-effective arbitration process. 

Under these rules, both parties have the opportunity to present their submissions and evidence to the arbitrator with a decision issued within 45 working days. The arbitration process is ‘on the documents’, meaning there is no hearing or meeting in person. This allows for significant time and cost savings. 

Want to know more?

NZDRC offers a fixed fee service for cross lease residential disputes. 

If you are not sure which process is the best for your situation, please contact us, and we can assist you. 

Other resources you might like

If you found this article helpful and are interested in learning more, there is a wealth of other resources available on our website. We have a wide array of articles and guides on a variety of topics, each designed to provide you with a deeper understanding of the subject matter. We encourage you to explore these resources and deepen your knowledge.

A judge's gavel rests on a wooden desk in the foreground, symbolizing justice. In the background, slightly out of focus, a person in a judicial robe writes on a piece of paper, possibly signing legal documents or taking notes.

Failing to engage in ADR could leave you tied up in knots

A seismic shift to the English legal system has been handed down by the Court of Appeal in Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416, in which the Court held that the lower County Court was wrong to decide that it did not have the powers to order the parties to engage in non-court-based dispute resolution.
An offshore oil rig stands in the distance at sea during sunset, with waves crashing onto the shore in the foreground. The sky is a gradient of orange and yellow, transitioning to deeper hues as it nears the horizon.

Arbitrators, independence and impartiality – important guidance from the UK Supreme Court

Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd [2020] UKSC 48

A scattered pile of US one-dollar bills, reminiscent of equitable compensation allowed for breach of an arbitration clause by a third party. The notes, featuring the portrait of George Washington, are overlapping each other and slightly crumpled, creating a textured surface with varying shades of green and white.

Equitable compensation allowed for breach of arbitration clause by a third party

The English High Court was asked whether a third party which derived rights from a contract, and failed to comply with the contract’s arbitration clause, may be held liable for equitable compensation – the High Court said yes. [1] This important decision establishes for the first time, that a party which derives rights from a contract, such as a subrogated insurer or assignee, may be held liable to pay equitable compensation where it brings a claim in a foreign jurisdiction contrary to the contractual forum clause.

The decision confirmed that:

  1. a third party which received the benefit of a contract containing an arbitration clause, must adhere to the provisions of the arbitration clause and may not act outside its scope;
  2. a party to that contract which is forced to defend proceedings brought in breach of the arbitration clause, is now entitled to compensation without having to apply for declaratory relief; and
  3. group companies which have had to defend themselves against proceedings brought in breach of the arbitration clause, may recover wasted costs in the absence of available remedies

Get in touch

Contact our team today to see how we can help

Contact us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.