Resolving cross lease disputes

Going through another COVID-19 lockdown can be challenging, and disputes with neighbours may crystallise with people spending more time at home. Cross leases have been used for many years for shared land ownership, giving rights and imposing obligations on cross lease owners but problems can arise where cross lease neighbours don’t agree.
Author(s): Natalia Vila
A modern two-story house with a combination of blue and white siding, featuring a dark gray roof. The house has a three-car garage with multiple windows, a well-lit interior visible through the windows, and a small front yard with a young tree. The sky is at sunset.

What is a cross lease?

Cross lease titles have been used for many years as a simple way to subdivide land. Under this title, multiple homeowners jointly own the land, and have the right to use and occupy their own home together with any other area intended for exclusive use. 

A cross lease title includes an agreement between the homeowners setting out the terms and conditions of the lease. Typically, the lease requires the homeowners to seek consent from the other lease holders to make any major building or renovation work. The terms of the lease may also provide for the use and maintenance of the common areas, quiet enjoyment, or whether pets can be kept at the properties, amongst other matters. 

Needless to say, homeowners may find themselves not agreeing with their cross lease neighbour.  Depending on the terms of your cross lease, your neighbour might indeed be able to have a say in what you can or cannot do in your own home.

A quaint, white, two-story house with a pointed roof stands alone in a vast, golden wheat field under a clear blue sky with fluffy clouds. A flock of birds flies in the sky, enhancing the serene, rural atmosphere.

What does a typical cross lease dispute look like?

We answer many enquiries related to disputes between cross lease neighbours such as: 

  • My neighbour keeps blocking the driveway; 
  • The neighbour’s tree is blocking access to my parking spot and they refuse to cut it; 
  • I want to make renovations but my neighbour is not giving me consent; 
  • The neighbour’s dog is barking all day long; 
  • They are having loud parties all the time; 
  • They have built a swimming pool without telling me; 
  • The neighbour’s fence is now within the boundary of my backyard. 
A person tends to a vibrant garden in front of a one-story brick house. The garden is filled with colorful flowers and neatly trimmed bushes. The sky is clear with a few clouds, and the street in front of the house is quiet and empty.

There are ways in which we can help with these disputes.  Mediation and arbitration are the two most popular dispute resolution processes for these disputes. 

Mediation

Mediation is particularly effective when the parties would like to repair the relationship with their neighbours. This process encourages the parties to work together to come up with a solution that is mutually acceptable. One of the benefits of mediation is that parties can engage in creative solutions instead of focusing strictly on the terms of the cross lease.  Our mediators have high success rates in helping parties reach an agreement and are available to conduct mediation during COVID-19 lockdowns as well. 

Two individuals are shaking hands over a desk. The desk has a laptop, a cup of coffee, a pen, a pair of glasses, and documents. One person is wearing a white shirt, and the other is in a black sleeve, possibly indicating a formal agreement or business deal.

Arbitration

Many cross lease disputes are resolved by arbitration. The majority of the cross lease agreements contain an arbitration clause, which means that the homeowners have already agreed to refer disputes to private arbitration instead of going to court. Arbitration clauses are often included in cross lease agreements to enable parties to get their disputes dealt with quickly, cost effectively and privately. 

One of the main differences between arbitration and court litigation is that in arbitration the homeowners have to choose the decision-maker, but getting agreement from parties already in dispute means this can be challenging. The parties can instead agree on who should appoint an arbitrator on their behalf. All the parties need to do is enter an agreement for NZDRC to appoint an arbitrator. 

The homeowners in dispute will also need to decide on the procedural rules that will govern the way the arbitration is conducted. NZDRC’s ECA45 Arbitration Rules are a popular choice for these types of disputes, and they offer the parties a fast and cost-effective arbitration process. 

Under these rules, both parties have the opportunity to present their submissions and evidence to the arbitrator with a decision issued within 45 working days. The arbitration process is ‘on the documents’, meaning there is no hearing or meeting in person. This allows for significant time and cost savings. 

Want to know more?

NZDRC offers a fixed fee service for cross lease residential disputes. 

If you are not sure which process is the best for your situation, please contact us, and we can assist you. 

Other resources you might like

If you found this article helpful and are interested in learning more, there is a wealth of other resources available on our website. We have a wide array of articles and guides on a variety of topics, each designed to provide you with a deeper understanding of the subject matter. We encourage you to explore these resources and deepen your knowledge.

A close-up image of several gold bars of varying sizes. The largest bar prominently displays "GLOBAL INTERGOLD," "100 g," "FINE GOLD," "999.9," and other specifications. Smaller bars with similar inscriptions are scattered around it.

Going for gold – Latest ruling from English Court of Appeal in tug of war over Venezuelan gold reserves

Deutsche Bank AG v Central Bank of Venezuela & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 742 is the latest instalment in the UK battle between two rival boards of Venezuela’s Central bank (the Central Bank) for control of Venezuela’s gold reserves and for authority to represent the Central Bank in related arbitration in London. With Venezuela’s 2018 election resulting in political turmoil over who is its legitimate President, the UK Supreme Court ruled in 2021 that the English courts must ‘speak with one voice’ with the UK Government, regarding who it recognises. The disputes over the gold are still ongoing and have already produced a series of court judgments on preliminary issues and the effect of the UK Government’s changing recognition.
A man with black hair and a beard, dressed in a black suit and white shirt, is sitting at a desk working on a laptop. The background is a grey textured wall. A small statue of Lady Justice is visible on the right side of the desk, hinting at his focus on drafting an arbitral award.

The nuts and bolts of appealing an arbitral award when you need the court’s leave

What is involved when you want to appeal an arbitral award but need leave from the High Court to get a foot in the door? Two recent decisions out of Hong Kong and New Zealand look at different aspects of the application process.

Court found arbitrator’s jurisdiction could not be resuscitated after delivery of final award even when award was conditional – that parrot is no more!

The Singapore Court of Appeal found an arbitrator’s jurisdiction had come to an end and there was no implied reservation of jurisdiction in the conditional award which he had issued. In its judgment, the Court stepped through the “tells” of a final arbitral award and how an arbitrator may reserve their jurisdiction.

Get in touch

Contact our team today to see how we can help

Contact us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.