An overview of our processes

NZDRC offers a number of dispute resolution processes to resolve your dispute.

Arbitration

Arbitration is a formal dispute resolution process where two or more parties agree to submit all or certain disputes between them to an independent person called an arbitrator. Arbitration is entered into by agreement and the process is governed by the Arbitration Act 1996 and the Arbitration Amendment Act 2007.

An arbitrator’s decision, called an award, is binding on the parties and is enforceable as a judgment of the Court.

Mediation

Mediation is a consensual, confidential, and relatively informal negotiation process in which parties to a dispute use the services of a skilled and independent third party called a mediator to assist them to define the issues in dispute, to develop and explore settlement options, to assess the implications of settlement options and to negotiate a mutually acceptable settlement of that dispute which meets their interests and needs.

Generally, any agreement reached will be recorded in writing and will be binding on the parties. Any party to such an agreement may enforce its terms by issuing court proceedings.

Mediation has the advantage of assisting in repairing and/or preserving business relationships where adversarial proceedings may not. Mediation is a particularly effective process in circumstances where there needs to be an ongoing relationship between the parties.

Arb-med

Arb-Med is a hybrid dispute resolution process that combines the benefits of arbitration and mediation, including: speed, procedural flexibility, confidentiality, choice of decision maker, ease of access to the tribunal, continuity, finality, and enforceability of the outcome.

The primary objective of Arb-Med is the informed good faith negotiation and settlement of the dispute by the parties, with the initial assistance and efficiency of the Arbitral Tribunal’s information gathering powers, in the context of a formal arbitration process that will immediately resume if the mediation that follows is not successful.

Adjudication

Adjudication provides parties to a dispute with a cost-effective but robust dispute resolution process that results in a determination being made by an independent adjudicator, typically within 35 working days.

Contractual Adjudication offers a proportionate and fast-track dispute resolution process with the primary purpose of improving cashflow, whilst providing quick and relatively inexpensive access to justice, alleviating pressure on the Courts.

Expert determination

Expert determination is a simple means of binding dispute resolution. Expert determination is a consensual, confidential and relatively informal process whereby parties to a contract agree to refer matters in dispute to an independent person to decide. The independent person is selected because the person is respected as having expertise relevant to the matters in dispute between the parties.

Expert Determination can provide either a binding or non-binding determination (subject to agreement by the parties) without involving many of the formalities that can beset more formal processes such as arbitration and litigation.

A determination which the parties have agreed shall be binding on them may be enforced by a party to the process issuing court proceedings.

Expert determination also has the advantage of assisting in preserving business relationships where strictly adversarial proceedings may not.

Early neutral evaluation​

Early Neutral Evaluation is a confidential, settlement oriented dispute resolution process that produces a non-binding evaluation of the facts, evidence and legal merits of a case by an independent neutral third party.

The objective of Early Neutral Evaluation is to position the case for early resolution by settlement or trial by providing the parties with guidance as to the likely outcome if the dispute were to be heard by a court in the form of an independent Evaluation of the facts, evidence, and legal merits of the matters in dispute.

Although settlement is not the primary objective, the purpose of Early Neutral Evaluation is to promote settlement discussions at an early stage in the litigation process, or at the very least to assist parties to avoid the significant time and expense associated with further steps in litigation.

Conflict management

Conflict management services include organisational performance audits, conflict management coaching, the development and implementation of integrated conflict management systems and strategies to improve performance and relationships to avoid disputes between employees, clients, suppliers, subcontractors and other stakeholders, and where conflict and disputes cannot be avoided, to manage disputes effectively.

Related conflict management resources

Other resources you might like

If you found this article helpful and are interested in learning more, there is a wealth of other resources available on our website. We have a wide array of articles and guides on a variety of topics, each designed to provide you with a deeper understanding of the subject matter. We encourage you to explore these resources and deepen your knowledge.

A man wearing a hard hat, safety goggles, and a plaid shirt is holding a notebook with sketches. He stands in a partially renovated room with plastic covering the window. A ladder and various construction tools are visible in the background.

Parliament passes sweeping amendments to construction payment regime

Parliament has recently enacted legislation allowing for comprehensive changes to the Construction Contracts Act 2002. The Construction Contracts (Retention Money) Amendment Act 2023 passed its third reading on Wednesday 29 March and received Royal assent on April 5. The legislation concerns the use and protection of retention money held by head contractors. It intends to strengthen current requirements for the purpose of giving subcontractors added security.
A person wearing blue jeans and a white shirt holds several coins in their right hand, with their left pocket turned inside out, against a plain background.

Where do directors’ duties lie once insolvency looms?

Hong Kong Court refuses to set aside arbitral award over claim lawyer couldn’t read witness’ body language in virtual hearing.

In BTI 2014 LLC v. Sequana S.A. [2022] UKSC 25, the UK Supreme Court handed down its judgment which examined the role of directors when a company becomes, or is likely to become, insolvent. The decision looked at when directors were to consider the overriding interests of the company’s creditors when dealing with insolvency.
A wide-angle view of a soccer match in a large stadium packed with spectators. The scoreboard shows a 0-0 scoreline. Players are actively engaged on the field, with one team in red and white and the other in black and white. Bright stadium lights illuminate the scene.

Arbitrator Breached Duty to Act Fairly by Seeking an Opinion From a Third Party and Conducting his Own Research

The Commercial Court has remitted an award to the arbitrator for reconsideration on the basis of serious irregularity after the arbitrator sought the opinion of a third party and conducted his own research without notifying the parties.

Get in touch

Contact our team today to see how we can help

Contact us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.